Saturday, March 29, 2014

SED 407 -- Co-Teaching, Lesson Planning, and a Brief History Lesson


I have to say that this was one of my favorite classes so far; I loved seeing lesson-planning and co-teaching in action. Watching an older veteran working with a younger teacher was really inspiring. I feel like I often hear about conflicts between young, naive idealists and older, jaded teachers who are reluctant to change. It was wonderful to see those stereotypes overturned, and to see two very different personalities and styles working together to create something new and interesting for their students. I was also pleasantly surprised to learn that there is such thing as a Dean of Pedagogy -- what a wonderful resource! Listening to the way that Buddy occasionally interjected to bring Bob and Kim back to the objectives was a great reminder of what we have to do in our own curricular planning. It’s imperative not to lose sight of the big ideas and ultimate objectives!
I really appreciate that Superintendent G took the time to explain the current CF situation, and the history of events leading up to this time. I empathize with the tough decisions that she’s had to make, and am enraged that she and her family were made to feel threatened. Nonetheless, I felt a little uncomfortable about the discussion overall. I feel like I still haven’t heard the side of the people I’m most interested in hearing from; the hardworking, sensible, open-minded faculty members who genuinely care about their students, and also may or may not have legitimate beefs with the administration. I’m not interested in hearing from the unprofessional saboteurs on the faculty that Superintendent G described when outlining her difficulties over the past few years. Their behavior wouldn't’ be acceptable in any profession, under any circumstances, and I have no interest in pretending that their behavior is excusable if they are ever my colleagues. However, Superintendent G made it seem like there is an impenetrable wall of teachers who stand by each other no matter what. I’m having a hard time believing that this is an objective truth. It may seem that way from Superintendent G’s perspective, but I don’t believe that some of the amazing teachers that I’ve worked with would protect someone who was hurting their students.
I also didn’t feel comfortable with what seemed like the vilification of the teachers’ union. I know that a great deal of corruption and misuse of power can occur in a union, just like in any organization. But I think we really have to remember that the union is there to protect teachers, and that there are very good reasons why unions exist. I found an interesting article entitled: “Why TeacherUnions are Good for Teachers -- and the Public” by Diane Ravitch, who we’ve talked about in class before.
Overall, it was a very interesting, very thought-provoking class. I have really enjoyed how candid our discussions have been, and I look forward to more of the same. I am curious though; was I the only one who felt a little uncomfortable about the way teachers as a group were being discussed?


3 comments:

  1. I think labeling any group a certain way is bound to be wrong to some extent. Of course not every teacher is one way or another, but I think its hard for us to know the situation when we are on the outside of it. Yes, the Superintendent has one view of what happened (a view where she was somewhat bullied) but its one of the only "primary" views that we have. It would be interesting to talk to some of the "accused" teachers and see what their point of view on the situation is. How did if feel for them to all be pink slipped? Did they get bullied from other teachers or administrators? There are always three sides to every story, the objective truth and the view of both sides. Is there a way for us to ever know what exactly happened?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe Jessica brings up a good point, something I haven't really considered...we probably will never know the truth. We get two very different perspectives. I do believe that Kim offers a somewhat in between as she is a teacher, she has lived through the ordeal, and come out on the other side. I really gained a lot of respect for her this week. I had a hard time sitting there and hearing all those stories because many sickened me, more so as a parent. I just kept thinking what if that was my kid? How would I feel? I felt that the parents sided with the Superintendent's and Board's decision and as a parent I can see why. My view may change once I become a teacher, but the fact remains that I will never know what really happened and that may just need to be okay. Too many people seem to be living in the past when CF is trying to pick up, dust itself off and move forward. Great things are happening here and many students still are in need of a good education and motivation to learn. That should be the focus, not what happened 4 years ago.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hearing the stories that Dr. G shared from 2010 in CF made me feel awful for her. I couldn't believe the way people acted toward her and her family. I can't imagine how she feels now that parents and teachers are confronting her about schools possibly merging. It also made me upset that at the meeting a couple of weeks ago the teachers still acted immature and were rude during the presentation. I can't imagine working somewhere if I were that unhappy with the things that occurred in the school system. However, it did make me glad to see teachers, like Kim, still enjoy her job and strive to be a great teacher. This proves that it is possible for teachers to move on after what happened. I just wish more teachers would.

    ReplyDelete